Judge Marvin Isgur Treated the Astros Like Nolan Ryan Treated Robin Ventura

Categories: Sports

No, Nolan Ryan returning to the Astros wasn't the most important thing to happen to the team this week.
While most of the city's attention Tuesday afternoon (and that of the local sports media) was centered on Nolan Ryan's return to the Houston Astros, on the other side of downtown Houston the asses of the Houston Astros' bankruptcy attorneys were being handed to them by Judge Marvin Isgur. And while the return of local legend Ryan to a PR-friendly role might make for good visuals and easy stories, what was happening in bankruptcy court was much more important to the short- and long-term future of the team.

The Astros appealed Isgur's ruling putting CSN Houston into Chapter 11 bankruptcy. And while appealing the ruling, the Astros requested that the judge stay his opinion, or stop enforcement of the ruling, until the appeal could be heard by Federal District Court Judge Lynn Hughes. Judges stay orders when they think there's a chance an opinion will be overturned, primarily when an area of law is still unclear, which it's not in this case.

As a result, the judge refused the Astros' request for the stay. He stated from the bench that the appeal was without merit and that it had no chance of success. He told them that the network could be a success, and that it was the team's duty, as one of CSN Houston's owners, to make the network a success.

To quote from Isgur's opinion that was issued on Wednesday:

The Astros' futility argument turns 'bad faith' law on its head. It is true that the petitioning creditors [Comcast] may not sustain an involuntary chapter 11 bankruptcy petition if a chapter 11 case would be futile. In this case (and contrary to the evidentiary record), the Astros now argue that the Astros, by exercising veto rights through its appointed director, can render any hope of reorganization to be futile. In this case, the alleged "futility" arises only because of the Astros' unsupported threats to cause a director to breach his duties. The Court is unaware of any case law that would support a dismissal based on futility that is engineered by the party seeking the dismissal.

Isgur further ruled in his opinion that the Astros didn't even have standing to challenge the bankruptcy and that while Comcast might have done an end run around the Astros to get the bankruptcy filed, it didn't matter because, unlike the Astros, Comcast was acting to save and preserve the network. The judge also accused the Astros of wanting to turn decades of established bankruptcy law on its head while offering zero legal support for its claims and arguments. In other words, the Astros attorneys struck out like Chris Carter did 212 times last season.

Isgur's written opinion was blunt and brutal. It was as if he was personally offended by the Astros' arguments before him, which is quite possible. And worse for the Astros, written opinions from bankruptcy judges tend to be a road map to follow for judges hearing the case on appeal. So when the court quotes Jim Crane saying the network can be a success with the right plan, then the odds of the appeals court giving in to the Astros are as slight as the team winning the World Series this season.

The Astros and the rest of the Comcast bankruptcy parties are set to appear before Judge Lynn Hughes Friday, February 21. The parties will talk to the judge and he'll probably come up with some kind of timetable for hearing the appeal and making a decision. But the Astros should not let it get that far. They should dismiss the appeal and get to work on reorganizing the network.

Sponsor Content

My Voice Nation Help

"The Court is unaware of any case law that would support a dismissal based on futility that is engineered by the party seeking the dismissal." Hey- the strategy works for the Republican Party...

Now Trending

Houston Concert Tickets

From the Vault