NFL Playoffs: Like Andy Dalton, Still Seeking My First Playoff Win
Well, any chance of pulling out of my season-long tailspin in the post-season appears to be out the window.
Playoff action all weekend long.
In excruciating fashion, the first weekend of the NFL postseason continued to bully me like Richie Incognito, jamming my head in the gambling restroom toilet and swirly-ing me into the poor house. The Colts roared back from being down 28 in the third quarter to hand me a push in their game with the Chiefs, the Saints kicked a last-second field goal to beat the Eagles (who wouldn't have covered anyway), and the 49ers covered by half a point on a last-second field goal against the Packers.
The only game that wasn't a nail-biter was my selection of the Bengals -6 1/2 against the Chargers. That's because Andy Dalton spent the entire third quarter burying his own team under a pile of turnovers. The Chargers went on to win the game straight up by 17 points.
Ironically, Andy Dalton and I have something in common -- we are both winless in the playoffs, Dalton 0-3 in his career and me 0-3-1 ATS this postseason.
Let's see if we can change that this weekend? (I know, no chance, right?)
Saints +8 over SEAHAWKS
Heading into the playoffs, I was firmly of the belief that (despite the oddsmakers' making the Chargers a longer shot at winning the Super Bowl) the Saints were by far the longest shot on the board. I mean, a team that's built to win at home (and seemingly only at home) has to go on the road to two outdoor, cold-to-really-cold locations in a row? No chance, I (stupidly) thought. Of course, now both the Saints
PATRIOTS -7 over Colts
Last season, before the Texans' playoff game against the Patriots, Dan Shaughnessy of the Boston Globe wrote a column that basically called the Texans a bunch of posers and frauds. It was an infuriating piece of literature if you were a Texans fan, made even more infuriating when Shaughnessy turned out to be spot-on in his analysis, with the Pats winning easily 41-28. Well, he's at it again. From yesterday's Globe:
I mean, all they have to do is beat the Indianapolis Colts? Seriously. It's just like two years ago when all the Patriots had to do was beat an 8-8 Tim Tebow-quarterbacked team at home (45-10, thank you). Or just like last year when all they had to do was beat a Houston team (41-28, thanks) on the verge of collapse (2-14 this year).
I don't know what's more insulting -- the Colts getting lumped in with the Texans or the Texans getting lumped in with Tebow! I know what the worst part is...Shaughnessy is going to be right again, and if that's the case, then I may as well sit back and enjoy it.