Repeat After Me: Gerrymandering Is Not to Blame

229px-The_Gerry-Mander.png
This Beast is not to Blame
Pundits and talking heads really like to blame gerrymandering -- here's a short history of the term -- as a/the reason for political polarization. This CNN news report blames gerrymandering for some of our political ills. Liberal media watch-dog Media Matters partially blames gerrymandering for the tea party. Even President Obama has bought into the "redistricting" argument:

A big chunk of the Republican Party right now is -- are in gerrymandered districts where there's no competition, and those folks are much more worried about a tea party challenger than they are about a general election where they've got to compete against a Democrat or go after independent votes. And in that environment, it's a lot harder for them to compromise
.

Well, as seductive and logical as President Obama makes it sounds, gerrymandering is simply not to blame for our current political ills. Indeed, political scientists will tell that the notion is "silly." The answer is much simpler:

The real reason for our increasingly divided political system is much simpler: The right wing of the Republican Party has embraced a fundamentalist version of free-market capitalism and succeeded in winning elections. (The Democrats have moved to the left, but less so.)

The Republican shift is the result of several factors. The realignment of Southern white voters into the Republican Party, the branch of conservative activism created by Barry Goldwater's 1964 presidential campaign and the party's increasingly firm stance on issues such as income inequality and immigration, can all be important to Republicans' rightward shift.

The "blame it on the gerrymanders" argument mistakenly assumes that because redistricting created more comfortable seats for each party, polarization became inevitable. Our research, however, casts serious doubt on that idea.




Advertisement

My Voice Nation Help
2 comments
ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul
ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul topcommenter

So it is OK if Democrats in gerrymandered districts are re-elected.  Plaintiff's Exhibit No. 1:  Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson -- D-TX, 30th District.

maxrb
maxrb

Sorry, that argument is just as bad as the gerrymandering argument.  I live close to work, my leanings have absolutely now factor on that.  The gerrymandering scenario would not work if there weren't low turnout primaries.  (For instance, do you think that the Democrats in South Houston really wanted a LaRouchie as their congressional candidate?  Could not have happened without a primary.)  As with nearly all things, there are multiple factors.

Now Trending

Houston Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

Loading...