Peter Kingman Lindsley: Infant Porn, for When Child Porn Isn't Sick Enough

Categories: Courts, Crime

prison103111.jpg
Prison time is coming for Montrose man.
A Montrose man has entered a guilty plea to possession of child pornography, and he's taken the "child" part of it to extremes.

Peter Kingman Lindsley, 49, was found to have on his computer "3,805 digital images and 860 video files that depicted children engaging in lewd exhibitions of the genital and the anus, sexual intercourse and deviant sexual acts, the vast majority of which involved infants," the U.S. Attorney's Office said.

The stash was found on a laptop in Lindsley's bedroom in the 1400 block of Richmond this summer. The Baytown police first discovered him trading child-porn pictures using peer-to-peer software on the web.

Lindsley plead guilty to one count of possession and faces minimum sentence of five years and a maximum of 20 years imprisonment and a maximum fine of $250,000. When he gets out of prison, he also faces a lifetime of supervised release.

My Voice Nation Help
23 comments
adarc
adarc

 Let's say that "vast majority"  is 75% - that means that at least 2853 of those photos were of children under 2 years of age. Where did they even come from? Better your check your kids when they come home from daycare, and know your babysitters well.

Juan Garcia
Juan Garcia

Yet there about to execute another possible innocent man in Texas...go figure!

alehound
alehound

What if the infant lead him on?.....

CherryBomb
CherryBomb

This is so sick. I weep for those poor innoccent children are forced into taking these disgusting photographs for these soulless predators. The toll it must take on them. I wish I could make it better for these innoccent victims of these unspeakable crimes. They are in my prayers and thoughts always and I hope justice is served and that more predators like his man are caught redhanded and pay for their crimes.

Bige8u2
Bige8u2

I say we bring back hanging for these sick bastards.....Good ole public linching might be just what this needs

a_short_haired_girl
a_short_haired_girl

wtf?! why doesn't he get life? you can not rehabilitate sexual offenders!

JB
JB

1400 block of Richmond.... The Richmont Square apartments? 

Prof Topkat
Prof Topkat

Lindsley, that piece of shit, is not all that unique.  There are many cretins who enjoy infant porn.  Worse yet, every year there are arrests of sub-humnas for actually raping tiny infants.  The death penalty should be reinstated for rape of an infant or toddler.

TootieFruite
TootieFruite

I don't even want to try and wrap my head around how a person can have sex with an infant without doing the baby serious bodily harm. It just makes this all that much sicker.

punkin003
punkin003

WTH????????????????????????  There is absolutely no rehabilitating these sick, poor excuse for human beings!  He needs to be locked up for life or he WILL do this again or WORSE!!!  These people should be caterated, and locked in the looney bin or prison for LIFE!  If not that, then put them to sleep like you would a rabid dog!  Sick f*cks! 

Assilem4791
Assilem4791

I think in Texas they do have the death penalty for sexual abuse of a child. This should be a no-brainer in my opinion, all states should have this.

Babyboy
Babyboy

What if the infant or toddler misrepresents his or her age? What if they are truly in love?

Claytoaj
Claytoaj

You can't wrap your head around it b/c it's not possible.  Of course it's going to injure, perhaps kill an infant.   I had a First Aid and CPR teacher tell me once, when I was taking his class, that he'd done a little First Aid thing at a prison.  One of the guys there had struck up a conversation with him, and he seemed reasonably intelligent and articulate.  The inevitable question came up..."What did you do to end up in prison?"   

The guy told him that he'd raped a baby. Furthermore, that she was so small he had to "use a knife to get into her".  

This guy, and people like him, should not be in prison.  They should be executed and composted, so maybe they can do one useful thing with their existence.

Gaff in a Head Act
Gaff in a Head Act

True, but the term "have sex with an infant" is quite the misnomer:  The term is "rape savagely."

The other implies mutual consent! Going to vomit now.....

Premierbooks Inc
Premierbooks Inc

Yes punkin i think we all want these monsters put down like the evil men who kill are lr rabid dogs are ... And at the very VERY LEAST LIFE IN PRISON WITH A TATTOE ON THEIR FOREHEAD for all to see them for the trash they are and even in prison where they keep our worst of the worst these guys are called out and get their just reward i can only imagine what great things are waiting for this man when the cell lights go out and jail guards turn there backs...... For evil to succeed good men need do nothing and any judge or prosecutor who doesn't call for life in prison need to investigated themselves for dereliction of duty or even worse

adarc
adarc

Which is probably why he pled guilty...it makes him less likely to get the most severe sentence.

Scretch
Scretch

That is so not funny

Guest
Guest

if you have the lid of an old tin can, that would work just as well.

Xbrainxspidersx
Xbrainxspidersx

It's not funny, what is funny is the story I read about the sex offender who tried to tell police that a six year old boy was coming on to him. These people are broken genetic garbage and should be disposed of.

Now Trending

Houston Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

General

Loading...