Exxon Leads The Environmental Fight By Suing The U.S. Over Winning World War II
So they're suing the United States, which blithely went ignored all sorts of Environmental Impact commandments just because they were in the middle of a war against Germany and Japan.
Exxon has sued the U.S. in a Virginia federal court, saying the company was forced (by the state of Texas, of all things) to clean up a Baytown refinery tainted with jet fuel and other stuff manufactured by the feds back in WWII.
According to Courthouse News Service:
Exxon says Uncle Sam built five more plants at its Baytown manufacture raw, war-related materials, such as synthetic rubber. It claims the government oversaw day-to-day operations of the plant, including waste disposal, and "generated substantial hazardous waste" during the 1940s and 1950s.On the other hand, $45 million seems a cheap price to pay not to be ruled by Nazi overlords or bowing to the Rising Sun.
"Much of the solid waste generated from the operations was treated and/or disposed of at various surface impoundments at the Baytown complex. Most of the treated wastewaters was [sic] ultimately discharged into nearby surface water bodies, such as the Houston Ship Channel, Scott's Bay or Mitchell Bay, at the Baytown Site," according to the complaint.
Exxon says it has been forced to spend $45 million in "response costs" required by Texas. And it "expects to incur substantial additional response costs in the future, to investigate and remediate the contamination at the site."
Exxon was Esso back then, and the company says the government all but took over operations at the refinery during the war, and therefore should be responsible for any pollution clean-up from that time.
Now, since Exxon has been running a refinery there since World War II, you might be wondering how they know the pollution wasn't caused by them instead of the dedicated Rosie the Riveters and 4-F workers who were kicking Hitler's ass.
Not to worry.
Exxon also claims it spent $200,000 on a consulting firm that investigated the site to determine who was responsible for the contamination, and the search "identified the Government" as the party responsible.The suit says the company "confidentially" contacted the Feds in 2004 seeking a settlement but was turned down.
We may have to double-check our figures, but in 2004 the Bush-Cheney administration was in charge, right? And you couldn't get them to rule on your side?