Mark Douglas Robison: MIT Alum Had Kiddy Porn on Computer, Cops Say

• if he has then he should face the consequences.

• It's manufactured to SHARE with other sick SOBs!  This fuels the fantasy to get one of those babies for their own!  With all of the options for sick people and porn today (not talking about basic consensual adult porn!) what they can view legally should be enough for their sick enjoyment.  To enjoy infant or child porn is beyond SICK, it is beyond DEPRAVED.  There is no word to describe this kind of person.

• May he burn in hell... Or even better get raped in jail every single day till he dies

• A huge difference between pic of drugs and robberies and pic of innocent children being MOLESTED. I bet u r his son to defend him. If he enjoys such sick acts then he to me and to every normal person is a criminal. Its not like adult porn this is CHILDREN for gods sake. BTW this guy was a coworker and i dnt feel sorry for him not a bit

• He should burn in hell!

• Why would anyone want to even look at disgusting photos of innocent children being violated I don't give a flying F***k         about political points , basic American rights you are a nasty SOB for doing so......you know who you are!

• What gives you the impression that even a fraction of all child porn is "manufactured" for sale? I would be very, very surprised if even 1 in 100 of all producers of child porn charged money for their videos/pictures.  

• What specious drivel. Your dishonesty is glaring, gryphon. You made a disgusting implication about someone attempting to argue a point of logic (a point i did not personally agree with, not that that should matter), and i called you on it.  Now, you characterize that defense as "protecting the rights of people to...". That is most certainly not what I was doing, though it was entirely predictable that you would attempt to smear me in exactly that fashion. You are a blatantly dishonest bully and a McCarthyite, gryphon50, and I have no interest in carrying on this exchange.

• yes, you are proudly upholding the American way of life by protecting the rights of people to own child porn! Where in the Constitution is that right again? I missed it. Sorry, I happen to think THAT is a shameful position.

• That a shameful implication to make, gryphon50. Agree or disagree with FF, he is making a political point about basic American rights; There is absolutely no tenable reason to assume that one has to be a creep or a weirdo to hold his general position. What IS creepy, is seeing busybodies try to stifle debate by scaring/intimidating people into silence. That is bullying, anti-American behavior, and those that engage in it should be ashamed of themselves. imo.

• Too bad he could afford bail ... or someone could've "FillPerfect form filler"ed his prison-b¡tch @ss ...

• Ummm no. Pictures of murder victims and drugs are not created and sold to service a market. Pornographic pictures of children are. If you could take away the market for kiddy porn, and I am aware that's not completely possible, children would not be violated to service that market.

• what's on your computer, I wonder? Bet I already know...

• Nobody should spend a day in prison for possession of a photograph. Go after the people who abuse children, not the people who look at pictures of the crime. Nobody gets in trouble for looking at pictures of murdered dead bodies or videos of robberies in progress. I see those videos/pictures on the news every night. We can possess pictures of heroin, cocaine, pot, etc.

TotalComments: 14