Texas A&M: Where Men Are Women, When It Comes To Title IX

Categories: Education, Sports

aggbball042611.jpg
Aggie women's basketball: Why aren't the dudes pictured?
The New York Times is out today with an interesting look at how colleges cook the books in order to comply with Title IX, the federal law that requires equality in men's and women's collegiate sports.

In order not to get afoul of the feds, you basically have to show you have about as many women competing for you as you do men. Since men's sports usually include football, with its 100-plus rosters, schools can scramble to come up with enough matching women.

The Times reports on women "athletes" who are listed on the rosters of obscure women's sports but never attend practice or games.

And then there's A&M, which, the Times says, is one of the schools exploiting a loophole that allows men who practice with a women's team to be counted as female.

"Texas A&M, which just won the women's Division I basketball championship, reported 32 players in the 2009-10 academic year, although 14 were men," the paper says.

Like we say, it's allowed: A federal official told the Times "men should be counted on women's teams if they receive coaching and practice with women."

But at A&M? Where the honor code demands truth, honesty and the American Way in all things?

Plus these dudes who "count as women" -- wouldn't they violate the Aggies' well-publicized trouble with those who stretch traditional rules of gender?

Not to mention that if males practice basketball with women, they come in close contact and it could lead to all kinds of "unchaste activities."

Oh, NCAA: What awful can of worms have you opened?

Update: The College Sports Council, a group advocating Title IX reform, issued a statement on the Times story.

Title IX has been turned into a gender quota law plain and simple, and it should not be a surprise that schools have become skilled in ways to game a system that is irretrievably broken. The use of gender quotas to prove compliance with Title IX has failed and the system must be reformed now.

Title IX as written supports equality of opportunity, not equality of outcomes, something that is impossible in athletics given the persistent imbalance between the sexes in interest in participating in a variety of areas, including intercollegiate sports. The use of quotas to enforce Title IX discriminates against male student athletes and artificially limits their opportunities to participate....

Measurement of interest, not quotas, will lead to fairness. In order to remedy the situation, the Department of Education should reinstitute the use of surveys to measure student interest in intercollegiate athletics, allowing schools more flexibility in complying with prong three of Title IX's three-prong test.

My Voice Nation Help
6 comments
Sort: Newest | Oldest
new york escorts
new york escorts

NY City abounds in tourist attractions, offering lots of wonderful moments to be cherished. In fact, the city has something for everyone - from Manhattan Skyline to Station Island's natural beauty; from buzzing nightlife to magnificent beaches; from historic heritage sites to memorials like 9/11 memorial and the Statue of Liberty. Not for nothing does it attract millions of tourists throughout the year from all around the globe.

rb008
rb008

Turns out the story is basically 100% inaccurate. What a surprise. The following is from the athletic director at A&M:----------- The New York Times published a story on Tuesday questioning our compliance with Title IX and specifically referenced our national champion women's basketball team and the male A&M students who practice with the team.

We are very proud of our Title IX compliance at Texas A&M and feel that we are leaders nationally in this area. In fact, every year we have a third party fully evaluate our Title IX compliance. Such an evaluation is not mandated.

Unfortunately, facts can get in the way of accurately reporting a story, especially when looking at an easy target like the recent national champion of women's basketball. Misconceptions and misinformation grows on itself. The New York Times writes things and other media regurgitate the information how they see fit.

Here are the facts.

Title IX essentially gives female student-athletes the same opportunities as male student-athletes. In order to comply with Title IX, one of the tests is the proportion of male vs. female students enrolled at the institution as compared to the proportion of athletic opportunities offered.

Title IX regulations require that an institution NOT count male practice players.

Meanwhile, the Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act (EADA) requires male practice players to be reported as participants on any women's team they practice with. In 2009-10, we had male practice players associated with women's basketball, women's tennis, and volleyball.

The EADA is a different calculation than that used for compliance with Title IX regulations. The bottom line is we are dealing with two separate laws with two separate definitions of a participant. The fact is we reported accurate numbers in each case, and we are compliant with both.-----------

Chase Wolfe Wears a Merkin
Chase Wolfe Wears a Merkin

Wow, you're up to 4 comments now. A new personal best! How does it feel to have exposed this bombshell to your tens upon tens of readers?

rb008
rb008

TO THE AUTHOR: You do realize that the Aggie Conservative group you are referencing about the "unchaste activities" is not affiliated with A&M?

Mridley737
Mridley737

What a childish article with no substance.

Chase Wolfe
Chase Wolfe

What a childish comment with no substance. It's a blog, not an article, and its substance is to summarize the ever-prevalent hypocrisy between a university's words and its actions, with A&M as the example.

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

Loading...