Harris County Judge Declares Death Penalty Unconstitutional; We're Guessing There Will Be An Appeal (Updated)

Categories: Courts
deadman030410.jpg
Updated with reaction from DA Pat Lykos, AG Greg Abbott and a nervous Texas Democratic Party.

State District Court Judge Kevin Fine may be the only judge in Harris County with tattoos running up and down his forearms, and he is certainly the only one to declare the Texas death penalty statute unconstitutional.

Fine was hearing motions Thursday from accused killer John Green's attorneys, and unpredictably granted a motion asking the court to declare the death penalty unconstitutional. Green is suspected of shooting a woman in 2008 and could be executed if found guilty.

"In every capital murder case," Green's attorney, Casey Kiernan, tells Hair Balls, "lawyers always ask the court to rule that the death penalty is unconstitutional. And this time the judge did it. I don't know that this has ever happened before in Harris County. It may be the bravest decision I've ever seen a judge make in more than 30 years as a defense lawyer."

This is not the first time Fine, a recovering drug addict who was elected to the bench as a Democrat in 2008, has made waves.

Last year, he was accused of telling an alleged rape victim in his court that he didn't believe she was raped because she was "on top" during the act.

Criminal defense attorney and legal analyst Brian Wice says he has known Fine for many years, going back to when Fine was a law clerk. He says Fine came to the bench after working as a defense attorney and not as a prosecutor.

"You couldn't fine a nicer guy," says Wice, "or someone who cares more deeply about what he does. I've been told that he finds, like many judges, the sentencing part of his job the most distasteful. Of the 21 criminal district court judges down there, if you had said to me who is the most likely among them to find the death penalty unconstitutional, I'm thinking I would have to tell you it was Kevin Fine."

Kiernan says the next move belongs to the prosecution. DA Pat Lykos will have to decide whether to appeal Fine's ruling. Phone calls to the DA's office have so far gone unreturned. Kiernan says he plans on meeting with prosecutors tomorrow to plot out the next steps.

Though it is doubtful that Fine's ruling would pass muster upon appeal, Kiernan is hopeful.

"What the judge is saying is that the system is broken in the state of Texas," says Kiernan. "And he really made a point of saying that more than 200 people have been exonerated. We won a big battle here today."

Updated: DA Pat Lykos has issued her statement.

Words are inadequate to describe the Office's disappointment and dismay with this ruling; sadly it will delay justice for the victims and their families. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals and other appellate courts have consistently rejected the same issues raised in the Green case.

The decision of whether to seek the death penalty is a solemn and profound responsibility. After a deliberative and thoughtful process this Office reached the conclusion to prosecute Mr. Green for the horrific capital murder he committed and to ask the jury to assess the death penalty. We respectfully, but vigorously disagree with the trial judge's ruling, as it has no basis in law or in fact. We will pursue all remedies.
And Attorney General Greg Abbott weighs in:

In an act of unabashed judicial activism, a state district judge ignored longstanding U.S. Supreme Court precedent and improperly granted John Edward Green's request that the court declare the death penalty unconstitutional. The Attorney General's Office has already offered to provide help and legal resources to the Harris County District Attorney's Office--which is handling the Green prosecution--and will take appropriate measures to defend Texas' capital punishment law. We regret that the court's legally baseless order unnecessarily delays justice and closure for the victim's family--including her two children, who witnessed their mother's brutal murder.
The Texas Democratic Party apparently wasn't too pleased by people pointing out that Fine's a Democrat: "This decision applies specifically to this particular case and does not waive the death penalty in Texas," TDP chair Boyd Richie said in a release. "Democrats believe that individuals who commit violent crimes and are found guilty in a fair trial should be punished harshly. We strongly support justice for victims and their families and believe in upholding their rights in court."

Comments (18)

USA1 says:

Oh brother...*rolling eyes*

Posted On: Thursday, Mar. 4 2010 @ 4:46PM
Gary Packwood says:

Good.

We need to take the time to join in the debate with the rest of the country.

If we listen intently we might learn why we have so many capital crimes here in Texas in the first place.

And we sure might learn - if we listen - why other states did away with the death sentence many years ago.
::
GP

Posted On: Thursday, Mar. 4 2010 @ 5:01PM
Dudley Sharp says:

It is an idiotic judicial decision and will quickly be overturned.

Posted On: Thursday, Mar. 4 2010 @ 6:50PM
casey keirnan says:

This is the beginning of of the end of the death penalty in Texas. Im proud to have been part of it

Posted On: Thursday, Mar. 4 2010 @ 7:12PM
Dudley Sharp says:

Casey:

What was the judge's basis for his finding?

Posted On: Thursday, Mar. 4 2010 @ 7:46PM
Scott Cobb says:

The New York death penalty was also declared unconstitutional in 2004, and the New York legislature chose not to enact a new death penalty law, so the death penalty was abolished in New York.

Posted On: Thursday, Mar. 4 2010 @ 7:49PM
Don says:

This judge should be disbarred!! What a liberal piece of trash!

Posted On: Thursday, Mar. 4 2010 @ 10:16PM
Don says:

@ Scott, Yea, and look at the crime in NY.

Posted On: Thursday, Mar. 4 2010 @ 10:19PM
Dudley Sharp says:

Scott is a bit misleading.

It was the death penalty statute that was found unconstituional in New York. The wording of the law.

The death penalty was not found unconstituional.

It is similar to what happened in Furman vs Georgia, the SCOTUS case which overturned all US death penalty cases in 1972 and vacated all death rows.

The death penalty was never declared unconstituional in that case, either.

Based upon the incomplete material I have gathered so far, Judge Fine's decison is similar to New York Federal District Judge Jed Rakoff's decision in the Quinones case, whereby the idiotic judge declared the federal death penalty unconstitutional, based upon innocence issues. At that time, I stated it was a pathetic decision and would be quickly overturned, which it was.

Posted On: Friday, Mar. 5 2010 @ 5:47AM
Brian Zygo says:

In a county where the DA's office would seek the death penalty for jay walking if possible, it's good to see the politics of hate/fear/death to a brief backseat to the true concept of justice.

Posted On: Friday, Mar. 5 2010 @ 11:45AM
Robert D says:

Keirnan...
If the death penalty is still legal in the Great state of TEXAS, then the STATE should be within their right to request it. If the jury decides to go with life, I am content. However, if a jury decides that this low life, murderer should die for his actions, it should be so. Until the death penalty is abolished in TEXAS, the "judge" should keep his crooked nose out of it.

Posted On: Friday, Mar. 5 2010 @ 12:00PM
USA1 says:

Calm down, bleeding hearts, capital punishment isn't going anywhere. tsk tsk tsk

Posted On: Friday, Mar. 5 2010 @ 1:49PM
D says:

It's interesting that many so-called conservatives rally around the death penalty. Allegedly they don't want government interference in their lives. But people who support the death penalty believe in an extremely powerful state--a state so powerful that it should have the right to kill its own citizens. That's extremely authoritarian.

Posted On: Friday, Mar. 5 2010 @ 3:26PM
Dudley Sharp says:

D:

I suspect you are confusing some issues.

I think all citizens want the government to interfere with criminals.

We want government to arrest, try and convict criminals and most citizens also want a few of them executed, for severe crimes.

So, goverment interference with criminals is encourgaed by all, except the criminals.

Posted On: Saturday, Mar. 6 2010 @ 5:04AM
D says:

Dudley, you're wrong. I do not want the state to have the power to kill any criminal. That's exactly the point.

That people who call themselves conservatives accept so much state authority shows that they're really radical statists--they want an extremely powerful state which is not a pretty thing.

Posted On: Saturday, Mar. 6 2010 @ 11:28PM
Dudley Sharp says:

D:

I think you are in error.

I think law enforcement means that citizens want people paying attention to the law. When folks don't, others want the m arrested and convicted.

In some case, we also want them executed. First, because it is seen as just, the same basis for all other sanctions. Seconly, execution means that the murderer can never harm, again.

Posted On: Sunday, Mar. 7 2010 @ 7:56AM
USA1 says:

D- We aren't rallying around the death penalty, we are rallying around justice.
You should be too.

Posted On: Monday, Mar. 8 2010 @ 4:26PM
p says:

everyone here should take an asprin

Posted On: Monday, Mar. 8 2010 @ 7:48PM

Write Comment


Comments may not show up immediately after submission. Please wait a minute after posting a comment for it to appear.

All reader comments are subject to our Terms of Use. By clicking "Post," you acknowledge that you have reviewed and agree to these Terms.

Sign up for free stuff, news info & more!

Tools

General

Health & Beauty

Services