Same Crap, Different County: Another Small Texas Town Overpunishes Another Piddly Drug Offender

Categories: Courts
crack_cocaine6.jpg
Photo courtesy DEA
A lot more crack than Melvin Johnson had
Think 35 years for a brick or so of pot is bad?

Try this one on for size...

In a case one local defense attorney has said showed "shades of Tulia," a Bay City man was sentenced to 60 years in prison for possessing 1.3 grams of crack.

Melvin Johnson III, 35, was convicted of possession with intent to deliver in January at the Matagorda County Courthouse.

His sentencing was held amid very tight security -- Johnson was shackled and extra deputies were brought in to conduct Johnson to and from the courtroom. According to the Bay City Tribune, observers feared violence because Johnson had refused to place his thumbprint on his judgment of guilt the court had entered an hour before.

At his trial, assistant DA Carla Post seemingly attempted to portray Johnson as the crack kingpin of Bay City. Under her direct examination, a Matagorda County sheriff told the court how his department had kept Johnson's alleged crack-peddling operation under surveillance and had acted on "the covert assistance of local citizens" in building their case. Using that information, they approached a local magistrate who signed a warrant.

Three days after the warrant was signed, Johnson's home was stormed by a SWAT team as Johnson's teenaged son played basketball in the driveway. The Matagorda County cops explained the delay between the signing of the warrant and its execution on their needing time to bring in the SWAT team -- Johnson does have a felony conviction for retaliation on his record.

After scouring the house, they found two crack-rocks weighing a total of 1.3 grams in the pocket of a jacket hanging on the door. That little pocketful of stones got Johnson six decades in TDCJ. (It bears mention that a United States dime weighs 2.2 grams. Crack kingpin Johnson was found to be in possession of one-half of a dime's weight in cocaine.)

The jury believed Matagorda County DA's Post and Steven Reis when they contended that there was no evidence that Johnson was manufacturing or using his tiny stash of cocaine. The two prosecutors stated that "all the evidence supported only the 'reasonable deduction and common-sense belief that Johnson possessed these drugs to sell them,'" and narcotics investigator James Nesbitt testified that "known crackheads" frequented Johnson's residence.

Cary Faden, one of Johnson's attorneys, asked Nesbitt if he could prove that Johnson was at home every time these known crackheads came calling. Nesbitt admitted that he could not. And Johnson's other defense lawyer, Michael Diaz, countered that there was no way to telepathically divine Johnson's intent.

The jury disagreed. Johnson was convicted. Since he had a felony conviction, and because intent to deliver is a more serious charge than simple possession, and maybe, just maybe, because Bay City is a merciless little town that lives up to the Texas stereotype about drugs and black defendants, Johnson was sentenced to 60 years.

"It's just pointless," says Scott Henson, of the award-winning state criminal justice blog Grits For Breakfast. "Even if you are the most law-and-order person in the world, there is simply no point in sending someone to jail that long for a gram of crack. All it does is make you feel good for being retributive."

Indeed, according to the Bay City Tribune, it did appear that the jurors felt pretty satisfied with what they had done. It was reported that after the proceedings, they palled around with the prosecutors. "We live in this town and raise our children in this town," one of the jurors told the DAs. "We want to help clean up our city."

And burden the rest of us with feeding and housing this guy until 2070. Henson believes that these kind of sentences are a "luxury" the state of Texas can no longer afford. He says that in 2007, many of the larger, more urban counties realized the magnitude of what was then a looming prison-bed shortage and have since availed themselves of greatly enhanced statewide diversion programs for drug offenders that have strong probation sentences as their centerpieces. Accordingly, the prison-bed shortage never materialized, as counties like Harris, Dallas, Tarrant and Travis scaled back the incarceration of low-level drug offenders.

But Henson thinks the smaller counties, like Smith (site of the 35-year pot sentence) and Matagorda, haven't got the memo yet. "These crazy-long sentences are still the culture there," he says. "These sentences were supposed to be thwarted by the diversion programs, but these places haven't got the message yet."

Matt Simpson, policy strategist for the Texas American Civil Liberties Union, points out that incarcerating Johnson for his full 60-year sentence will cost Texans over a million dollars. "How much drug education could you buy for a million dollars?" he asks. "How many rehabilitation programs could you fund for that money? Is this the highest and best use for the state's money in this case?"

And expenses like this take on greater import with the state and many municipalities facing budget shortfalls. Governor Perry has stated that he wants a five-percent budget cut for TDCJ.

Henson has an elegant little solution: an across the board discount in drug penalties. He would have them max out at what is now a second-degree felony instead of first. Less than a gram possession would be a Class A misdemeanor.

"Simultaneously, he writes, "they should invest a portion of the savings in stronger probation and reentry programs."

Besides just being fair and the right thing to do, the move would immediately reduce pressure on the prison system, allowing the state to save money by closing prison units or eliminating private prison contracts. Other states are considering similar measures in light of the budget crunch; most recently Colorado saw legislation filed along these lines.

The biggest complaint would come from overcrowded county jails don't want to deal with offenders currently sent off to so-called "state jails" for the equivalent of fourth-degree felonies. But those extra prisoners could be more than offset by similarly ratcheting down marijuana penalties in the misdemeanor range. That would make low-level pot possession cases (less than 2 oz) a Class C misdemeanor that generates ticket revenue instead of a Class B which clogs up misdemeanor courts and runs up unnecessary indigent defense bills, generating cost savings at all levels of government. (Where are the small government conservatives when you need them?)

Where indeed?


Comments (45)

Bessie Burnsed says:

what a bunch of crap. your life is not in your hands....

Posted On: Thursday, Mar. 11 2010 @ 5:22PM
Michael says:

Texas needs this. The fact that we are still giving these draconian sentences for non violent crimes is absolutely ridiculous.

Anyone who pays taxes should be outraged.

Posted On: Friday, Mar. 12 2010 @ 1:53AM
Alex says:

How can we help lower this man's sentence?

Posted On: Friday, Mar. 12 2010 @ 2:07AM
Jury Nullification says:

Nullify unjust laws.

Stop the persecution of thosed accused of victimless non-crimes.

Never consent to be searched or answer any question.

Posted On: Friday, Mar. 12 2010 @ 2:08AM
David says:

Oh, and is it the first time time that this man has been arrested? Does he have any history with narcotics?

What the the effects of a crack-house on the community?

I wouldn't compare this case with one in Tyler. Pot doesn't hurt anyone. It's non-addictive. People don't go to rehab for it.

Posted On: Friday, Mar. 12 2010 @ 2:12AM
Pimp ME says:

love the UGK reference

"pocket full of stones"

Posted On: Friday, Mar. 12 2010 @ 2:34AM
Erich says:

People in the neighborhood knew he was dealing, so much so they helped police with surveillance.

The jury didn't sentence him to 60 years for mere possession of 1.3g, they were convinced that he was a dealer and only got caught with 1.3g.

Plus, he's a repeat felon; convicted of Retaliation (Obstruction or Retaliation).

60yrs may a bit harsh, but let's not make this out to be a poor drug addict getting hit with a 6 decade sentence for mere possession.

Posted On: Friday, Mar. 12 2010 @ 2:39AM
Colby says:

What are you talking about? People do go to rehab for pot; it does not affect everyone equally. Even though it may not be physically addicting, there are still elements of addiction with anything that increases an endorphin rush to your brain.

I will agree with David that past problems should be considered. Regardless, Texas is one of the most outrageous backwards places in our country and i feel extremely sorry for future tax payers carrying this burden and the remaining sane current residents.

Posted On: Friday, Mar. 12 2010 @ 2:49AM
James says:

What is wrong with our legal system? 60 years is absurd for a drug crime.

Posted On: Friday, Mar. 12 2010 @ 2:59AM
Jb says:

And lil wayne gets a year for a gun charge....

Posted On: Friday, Mar. 12 2010 @ 3:15AM
The Tim Channel says:

Wonder how they treat drunk drivers in their community? I'm guessing there are people in that community who have killed others while drunk driving and are not given sixty years in jail.

I always like to note that all drugs were legal until 1904. But that was back in 'the good old days'.

Enjoy.

Posted On: Friday, Mar. 12 2010 @ 3:21AM
H. Hedges says:

I mean are you forreal? I don't think that the man should of got away with nothing but 35 years? Thats more time than a man gets for killing someone...or many people! Get ahold of yourselves. Calm down and really evaluate this siituation. It isn't like he is the only source of crack cocaine in that town. The crack heads are just gonna go find the next one. Think about this mans family. APPEAL!

Posted On: Friday, Mar. 12 2010 @ 6:01AM
AlienMidKnight says:

The War on Drugs. Yes Yanks, your government has declared war on its people. Somehow I feel when a government does this, usually you have the right to bear arms for this exact reason, so that your rights are respected. Now lets say this happened in North Korea, we would all be happy to say, see the Dictatorship isn't respecting its people, bla, bla, bla. So what is the bigger crime here, the little bit of crack in a pocket, or the total abuse of power. This is what happens when your government is out of control, or should I say, when someone in the government is out of control. Time to wake up people, cause if you think this will get better, history has proven that it will only get worst.

Posted On: Friday, Mar. 12 2010 @ 7:26AM
Jess WOods says:

Yee Haw, Only in Texas! The biggest Kangaroo Courts in the land Yee haww.

Jess
www.isp-snooping.es.tc

Posted On: Friday, Mar. 12 2010 @ 8:04AM
John Lomax says:

@pimp me: And they sure didn't leave his ass alone...

Posted On: Friday, Mar. 12 2010 @ 8:35AM
Wayne Junction says:

I thought this was the "Christian" part of the USA-- what happen to the forgiveness thing?

Posted On: Friday, Mar. 12 2010 @ 9:55AM
A Texan says:

I agree with the article, he shouldn't have been given a long sentence. He should have been given a long drop on a short rope. He wasn't a user, he was a violent dealer driven only by greed. He's getting far, far better than he deserves.

Posted On: Friday, Mar. 12 2010 @ 9:57AM
Wyatt says:

@ A Texan

Yeah, let's execute people for drug possession. Nothing cruel and unusual about that! In fact, any action that could possibly have negative effects on others should be a capital crime. Verbally abusive to your kids? Off with your head! Steal a DVD from Wal-Mart? Gas chamber! Get caught with a phony inspection sticker on your car? How about a big-ass ant pile and honey!

Forget the Enlightenment and the Constitution, forget that we willingly sacrifice some safety to live in an open society that should free from legalistic extremism -- we've got a ROPE.

Fucking troll.

Posted On: Friday, Mar. 12 2010 @ 10:17AM
Heywood says:

Wyatt you are a tool. Nuff said on that matter. Go live next to a crack house and see how life really works in a neighborhood ruined by assholes like this one.

Posted On: Friday, Mar. 12 2010 @ 11:04AM
Another Texan says:

I agree with A Texan, we just just kill him. In fact we should just kill everyone convicted of anything related to violence. Like if some dude gropes your wife in a bar and you punch him an break his nose and you are then convicted of assault for it. You should be killed. If you got caught drunk outside a bar in an alley peeing on the wall and got convicted as a sex offender, instead of having to register for life and never get another job, you should be killed. How about we just kill all drug users too. Anyone that smokes pot, uses crack cocaine or magic mushrooms oh wait but not caffeine or nicotine or alcohol, cause those are popular and that makes those ok right. Oh oh, wait how bout things like Opium, yeah, we should kill those people too. And all opium derivatives in fact, like heroine, oh wait but not morphine, and codeine, oxycodone and ibuprofen cause those are made by drug companies, so those are ok right. And drug pushers, those should DEFINITELY all be killed, like this guy, oh wait and all the alcohol and tobacco and pharmaceutical companies cause MANY of their products can kill people just like pot and, oh wait no not pot, that doesn't kill people, where was I? oh yeah, we should kill the ones who push the drugs that kill the most people like heroine and cocaine, oh wait no, that's tobacco and alcohol. Umm, yeah, but we should definitely be killing someone. yeah.

Posted On: Friday, Mar. 12 2010 @ 11:21AM
Steve Dallas says:

I'd like to know his entire criminal history before I say this is unjust. The article even admits he's got at least one other felony, what else has he got? If it takes a micky-mouse crime to get a bad guy off the streets, I'm O.K. with that.

Fact is, crime is at a historic low in the U.S., despite the Great Recession (I was always told bad times increased crime). A good part of the reason for that is that bad guys are in jail (so said a recent Time article on the subject).

Posted On: Friday, Mar. 12 2010 @ 11:22AM
loljusticesystem says:

I'm from a small town 40 minutes away from bay city and a white man killed 3 people in drunk driving crash, he was the only survivor and he got 5 years. The justice system is a fucking joke.

Posted On: Friday, Mar. 12 2010 @ 11:54AM
Wyatt says:

@ Heywood

I'm not saying the guy shouldn't go down, not at all. I was actually responding to two things:

1. An excessive punishment for possession. That's a crazy amount of time for a small amount of drugs. He's a dealer, I guess? Well, any department worth its salt should be able to provide evidence of dealing pretty easily in the case of some neighborhood small fish. All it would take is some light surveillance. Burden of proof is on law enforcement, as it should be. If you don't like that, I hear China's nice this time of year.

2. A Texan's assertion that we should just kill anyone who violates the law. Retarded trolling, I know.

@ Steve

You talking about this? http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1705342,00.html

Because it doesn't really say that...if it's a more recent article, I'd be interested in seeing it.

Posted On: Friday, Mar. 12 2010 @ 11:57AM
Not from Texas says:

What happens when we actually look at the root or source of the problem and employ a solution instead of pasting a bandaid over it?

Scientific research shows that people in these neighborhoods (low-income, poverty) will resort to crime in order to survive in this society.

Although a solution to the low-income neighborhood is not apparent since most people will vehemently protect capitalism, a solution to the crime of drug dealing is much more apparent: Treat the issue of drug abuse as a health problem instead of a criminal problem (just like we do with alcohol - another drug).

Take away the power of the dealers by declaring drugs not illegal and therefore worthless.

Wow a holistic approach guaranteed never to be tried in a society still looking to exert force to achieve its goals.

Oh well. At least I tried.

Posted On: Friday, Mar. 12 2010 @ 12:22PM
Matthew Toepfer says:

This Judge and Prosecutor should be disbarred.

Posted On: Friday, Mar. 12 2010 @ 12:22PM
Feldwebel Wolfenstool says:

No wonder people are shooting the Pigs down there. Hey! Read this, all you saps in the "land of the free"...

http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/12/a-power-couple-unplugged/

speeding, d.u.i., apparently 8 grams of dummydust in his pocket.

If someone threw my brother in jail like this, there'd be a murder.

Posted On: Friday, Mar. 12 2010 @ 12:47PM
Not from Texas says:

"Good people don't need laws and bad people don't obey them, so what good are they?"

Posted On: Friday, Mar. 12 2010 @ 1:17PM
Also from Texas says:

@Texan, are you serious? The sentence was probably harsh, execution is only worse.

Assuming that they had reasonable evidence for the distribution of crack (which I believe is far worse than Marijuana) he should have gotten no more than 20 years.

Posted On: Friday, Mar. 12 2010 @ 1:33PM
JaredMelton says:

lets just give texas back to the mexicans, let all religous wackos be they're problem

Posted On: Friday, Mar. 12 2010 @ 2:35PM
David says:

Uhh the system might be broken but it was the jury the convicted and sentenced him. (That's right, his peers- just like it guarantees in the Bill of Rights.)

That aside- if you're selling crack, you know that you're ruining your clients lives. Same with cigarettes though.

Posted On: Friday, Mar. 12 2010 @ 4:35PM
colbertftw says:

If this guy was such a king-pin type crack dealer then how is it that the cops only caught him with crumbs? No funds for surveillance?

You have just succeeded in removing 10 minutes worth of crack from your streets in return for millions of dollars in prison expenses. Congratulations.

And who really cares if one more poor, addicted black man rots in prison for very little reason. I hope your need for vengeance has been satisfied.

Your flawed American society is directly reflected by this snippet of your justice system. (Thank Christ I don't live there.)

Posted On: Friday, Mar. 12 2010 @ 6:36PM
The Real Truth says:

Others pointed out, quite realistically, that we didn't get the whole story here. How bad was the prior crimes and criminal history?

I read that 80% of the crimes are created by 1 or 2 percent of the population - the same 1 or 2 percent. This does not include minor criminals. We're talking about career criminals. It's important to get the career criminals off the streets, and the cost of incarceration doesn't matter. Another example, I read that the reason that we have so few serial killers, as opposed to the 70's and 80's, is that back then, they let them go thinking that they could be 'reformed,' and meanwhile their crimes got worse. Since the 1980's, we put them in jail for good. Rodney Alcala is a classic case of this. But more recently, they released John Gardner from jail in San Diego, and he killed those two young girls,Chelsea King and Amber Dubois, a few weeks ago. Sad, sad, sad.

However, I do agree that if an 18-year-old caught with that amount of crack cited in this article, would be a complete travesty of justice, and financially stupid, to imprison him or her for that amount of time. If the small community insists on jailing someone for 60 years, on a charge like this, then they should bear 100% of the cost themselves (see how committed they really are in that case....).

On the other side, as a counterbalance, you have Noelle Bush, Jeb Bush's daughter (George Bush's niece), who did a bunch of nasty stuff that would have put her away for a long time if she was a poor 25-year-old black woman. Check it out:

According to Wikipedia, Noelle Bush attempted to “fraudulently obtain a prescription” at a Walgreens Drug Store located in Florida using the name “Noelle Scidmore." Noelle Bush was ordered by a judge to attend a rehabilitation program. During her time at the facility, Bush was found in contempt of court after being found in possession of TWO grams of cocaine, and was sentenced to 10 days in jail.

Posted On: Friday, Mar. 12 2010 @ 8:32PM
Texans are racist and gay says:

this guy was not caught selling drugs... he was caught with drugs. Texas once again lives up to there name of racist, religious douchebags. How about we send everyone to jail who smokes cigarretes and has a DUI on there record.

Posted On: Saturday, Mar. 13 2010 @ 9:39AM
Tom says:

Erich, your argument is intellectually dishonest.

Lets say that I have people coming and going from my house. How the **** do they "know" illegal drug transactions are taking place, unless they are in my house witnessing the actual transaction? All they see are people coming and going.

Secondly the police "suggested" such was the case to the nosey do good-er neighbors.

This was, stupid, stupid, stupid period.

Posted On: Saturday, Mar. 13 2010 @ 11:35AM
Mike says:


Who really thinks this conviction should hold up on appeal? How ignorant do you have to be to believe these rules of evidence met judicial standards of proof? Who is naive enough to think this was not about moronic white racists on the jury, responding to a pandering racist DA? Who thinks a white, middle-class person with 1.3 GRAMS (!!) of coke would go to jail for more than a year? (This coke was about as large as a piece of pocket lint. Intent to distribute???)

No one of good conscience can accept this brand of old-time lynching "justice."

Posted On: Saturday, Mar. 13 2010 @ 5:56PM
jesse says:

Drug dealer or not, 60 years is asinine. Many murderers do not get that long a sentence. Is George Bush governor again?? ;-)

Posted On: Monday, Mar. 15 2010 @ 7:58AM
Popi says:

Possession of crack carries more jail time than possession of larger amounts of cocaine.

Why?

Crack is cheap and readily available in areas with a high minority population. Always. So who receives crazy amounts of jail time which almost guarantee a lifetime of fucked uppery? Blacks mostly...While whites with more coke get off relatively easy.

Think about that

Posted On: Wednesday, Mar. 31 2010 @ 1:13AM
Anonymous says:

im banging screw nigguh diamonds up against that wood. r.i.p. pimp c

Posted On: Wednesday, May. 5 2010 @ 10:42AM
Houston Texan says:

I agree that this punishment is beyond excessive. It doesn't matter what you suspect someone of being dealing crack or murder, the fact is there must be evidence. The key word in justice system in JUSTICE. Even if this were a reasonable sentence for a dealer (which is is laughably not even close), there is no evidence that he was dealing. Where is the justice in that?!
Everyone should be outraged not only at the sentence, but at the vigilante justice these jurors seem to be imposing.

Posted On: Thursday, Jun. 10 2010 @ 6:20PM
Houston Texan says:

I agree that this punishment is beyond excessive. It doesn't matter what you suspect someone of being dealing crack or murder, the fact is there must be evidence. The key word in justice system in JUSTICE. Even if this were a reasonable sentence for a dealer (which is is laughably not even close), there is no evidence that he was dealing. Where is the justice in that?!
Everyone should be outraged not only at the sentence, but at the vigilante justice these jurors seem to be imposing.

Posted On: Thursday, Jun. 10 2010 @ 6:32PM
2012 says:

Tex ain't alone, you can check out these druggie type of sentences throughout also florida and much of the 'solid' south.

There is a much bigger picture here. A big part of the reason (ulterior motive) why a tour(s) of duty for young men and women in the middle east continues. The power elite considers the overseas venue a training ground for beat cops, swat team and special ops, bringing that war over there to here as USA society continues to cannibalize itself with the onset of an increasingly decaying economy, of which the super rich live under the umbrella of the slap on the wrist double standard, while the commoners eat each other alive, under a guise and facade of sympathic victims advocacy with law and order activist groups inciting evermore fervor in extreme punishments of the 'caught imperfect' or 'untouchables' class.

Posted On: Saturday, Jun. 12 2010 @ 3:15PM
Big Willie says:

This trial should have been moved into a different area, Presumably one in a low income area, where they actually care if there's evidence... 1.3 grams isn't enough to prove without a doubt that he was dealing... definately gross incompetence on the defense side... he should move to have his lawyers removed and a complete new trial in another area... anyone with even a slight bit of intelligence can see he didn't receive a "fair" trial

Posted On: Wednesday, Jun. 23 2010 @ 1:23AM
TB says:

for those who have been incarcerated and come in contact with an individual including a correctional officer the wrong way and the correctional officer feels intimidated or threatened , an inmate can be charged with retaliation. Below is the Texas statue. It would be easy to file the felony case on those already incarcerated... One should look into how many prosecutions given to those who have had the same type charges.

I believe the punishment given in this case is pro-ponderous and shameful. As a human being, I would look at all the facts, previous case files, and past punishment given for the offense. It seems as if the jurors became personally involved and could not be an objective party. Small time mentality... The punishment given for the alleged offense in which the suspect was charged is not conducive to the actual crime itself, regardless of the retaliatory conviction.

The situation is sad, sad, sad... Statistically speaking. A father taken away from his child(ren).

Sec. 36.06. OBSTRUCTION OR RETALIATION. (a) [amended 9/1/97] A person commits an offense if he intentionally or knowingly harms or threatens to harm another by an unlawful act:
(1) in retaliation for or on account of the service or status of another as a:
(A) public servant, witness, prospective witness, or informant; or
(B) person who has reported or who the actor knows intends to report the occurrence of a crime; or
(2) to prevent or delay the service of another as a:
(A) public servant, witness, prospective witness, or informant; or
(B) person who has reported or who the actor knows intends to report the occurrence of a crime.
(b) For purposes of this section, "informant" means a person who has communicated information to the government in connection with any governmental function.
(c) An offense under this section is a felony of the third degree.
Before 9/1/97 (a) provided:
(a) A person commits an offense if he intentionally or knowingly harms or threatens to harm another by an unlawful act:
(1) in retaliation for or on account of the service of another as a public servant, witness, prospective witness, informant, or a person who has reported or who the actor knows intends to report the occurrence of a crime; or
(2) to prevent or delay the service of another as a public servant, witness, prospective witness, informant, or a person who has reported or who the actor knows intends to report the occurrence of a crime.

Posted On: Tuesday, Jul. 6 2010 @ 12:52PM

Write Comment


Comments may not show up immediately after submission. Please wait a minute after posting a comment for it to appear.

All reader comments are subject to our Terms of Use. By clicking "Post," you acknowledge that you have reviewed and agree to these Terms.

Sign up for free stuff, news info & more!

Tools

General

Health & Beauty