
Tell me, why do you boo him, but not Jeff Kent? Jeff Kent also left the Astros after the 2004 season, and he too left to sign a better free agent contract for money. But I don’t hear him booed whenever the Dodgers play the Astros. Why isn’t he treated with the hatred and contempt of Beltran? Hell, the guy played here for two seasons; Beltran wasn’t even here for an entire season. So where’s the hatred? Is it because Jeff Kent is a white guy?
No, it can’t be a racial thing because you people seemingly adore Miguel Tejada, and he’s a steroids-abuser who lied to the Feds about his name and age and is currently under Justice Department investigation for lying to Congress. And Beltran’s a far superior player to Tejada. Yet Tejada is adored and Beltran is hated. And you people love Carlos Lee, and he hustles only when it’s time to get to the postgame buffet or when some cattle is for sale. And once again, Beltran is far, far superior to Lee as a player. So that leads me to believe the Beltran hatred is not a racial thing.
So what is it then?
Why isn’t Randy Johnson treated with this same hatred and contempt? He arrived at the trading deadline in 1998, and he left as a free agent as soon as the season ended. But you fans don’t boo him whenever the Diamondbacks come to town. In fact, he’s still treated with a degree of respect for helping the Astros to make the playoffs in 1998. But the Astros might not have made the playoffs in 2004, or come within a game of making the 2004 World Series, if not for Beltran.
So why the double standard?
I don’t get it. I really don’t.
So someone, please, explain this to me. Why do you hate Carlos Beltran so damn much? And please don’t tell me it’s because he left this team to get more money because that’s what Jeff Kent and Randy Johnson did, and it’s what any of you would do if given the same chance.
But I’m guessing you won’t tell me because you don’t have a reason. There is no reason to boo Carlos Beltran. It’s just a bunch of morons acting like idiots. And if anyone’s got a better reason than that, I’d really like to hear it. – John Royal









I'll take a stab at explaining it, at least from my perspective. I booed Beltran his first year or two as a Met but have since gotten over it as his numbers have been average.
Beltran is equivalent of the hot chick that led Astros fans on in his time with the club and eventually used the Astros as leverage to get the deal he wound up with. His numbers were phenominal in his time here, and his playoff performance was spectacular. Astros fans and management were impressed with his performance while here, and REALLY wanted him to stay. The team claims that they did all they could to keep him, even placing ads in his local newspaper in the off-season promoting Houston as Carlos' next destination and making frequent calls to Carlos. In the end, Carlos and Satan (Scott Boras) used the interest from the Astros to get the deal he got and really only used the Astros as a bargaining tool as they readily admitted that they had no real interest in Carlos staying in Houston. The analogy I make is that Carlos was like a hot chick that used the Astros to get a ride to the nightclub where he left the 'stros blue-balled and hooked with the rich dude in the VIP section.
Kent and Johnson were different in that they were more upfront in their approaches. We knew going in that Johnson was a rental and it was a long-shot that he would stay. We enjoyed him while he was here and appreciated his contributions, but we knew all along that we didn't have a shot cause he basically told us we didn't have a shot. Kent left because basically we offered him a minimal salary and would have been fine if he stayed but were okay if he left. We didn't go out of our way to keep him and really only made an offer because the team felt obligated. A lot of people were also okay with Kent leaving because it allowed Biggio the opportunity to move back to 2nd base from the outfield, where he never really belonged in the first place. To continue my analogy, Johnson was our high-priced call-girl that we knew would leave when our act was done, and Kent was like the girlfriend we had that left by mutual agreement. Neither Kent nor Johnson broke our heart because we knew it was coming; Carlos tore the heart out of our chest and stomped on it in front of us while his wingman stood and helped him.
All that being said, if Carlos had come right out and said that he didn't have any intention of coming back to Houston rather than using Houston as a pawn in a really non-existant bidding war, or if he had taken the deal from the Mets early on without hesitating and making it look like Houston really had a chance, he probably would not be as reviled as he is in Houston. It also doesn't help that he has Scott 'Satan' Boras as an agent.
So, much like the steriod situation has evolved, basically it boils down to approach. Johnson and Kent were upfront in their approaches, much like Pettitte and all was basically forgiven. Beltran was deceitful, much like Clemens, and now he has hell to pay.
Others might disagree, but this is my analogy filled explanation.
Posted at: August 4, 2008 3:59 PM